Race War in America. Part Three: Ayo Kimathi

Race War in America.  Part Three: Ayo Kimathi

“Warfare is imminent and in order for White people to survive the 21st century, we are going to have to kill a lot of Blacks–more than our Christian hearts can possibly count,” kill them because Blacks are a “sadistic race of devils.”

Approximately how long would a white “small business specialist/acquisitions officer” or any other white employee, at the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement division or elsewhere who posted that trash on his website remain in his position? 

A week?  A day?  An hour?

However, black nationalist Ayo Kimathi seemed immune from any repercussions for his murderous racism until he was exposed last August by, of all groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center.  Even then he kept his job dealing with whatever small businesses the DHS or ICE has to deal with until November after conservative media went viral with the story and pressured the DHS until they finally put Kimathi on administrative leave pending further review.

With full pay of $115,731 per annum–plus benefits.

Of course, there is no way of knowing whether the leftist-liberal SPLC outed Kimathi because of his black racist trash blogging about white people or because he attacked President Barack Hussein Obama as a “treasonous mulatto scum dweller,” former Secretary of State “Colon” (sic) Powell and Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas as “Uncle Toms,” warned that some whites and Obama are trying to “homosexualize” black men to make them weaker, and suggested that a woman’s primary role should be to “keep a strong Black man happy.” 

Still, not content with posting that drivel, he vilified black icons Al Sharpton, Lil Wayne, Oprah Winfrey, Whoopi Goldberg, Condoleezza Rice, as well as “Gay  Edgar Hoover.”

Based on how Obama’s government and operatives operate, I’d give odds that that the SPLC outed Kimathi not as a result of his anti-white tirades and threats of a race war but due to his abuse of homosexuals and black heroes.

Sarah Palin . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34339.)

Race War in America. Part Two--The Knockout Game

Race War in America. Part Two--The Knockout Game

 (The following dialogue is excerpted or adapted from TRU-tv’s “Bait Car.”  The context is different in that it involves the very popular “knockout” game and not stealing cars but the language and participants are identical.  It also represents the latest development in America’s ongoing race war that few recognize or refuse to concede even exists.)

Hey, Dawg!  Wanna do sumpin?  Ah’m bored.
Ah dunno.  Whatcha wanna do?
Ah dunno.  How’s ’bout clockin’ sum cracker?
Ya mean like dat knockout game?  Leroy done ben doin’ dat fo’ years!
Yeah, but now all da boyz is doin’ it and dey all gets away wid it!  And dose motherf**kin’ honkies is coverin’ fo’ us!
Cool, ni**ah, let’s jest get it on den!  Ah needs some scrilla! 
No, no, fool!  We don’ rob ‘em!  We jes knock dose crackers upside dere heads! 
Jes fo’ fun?  
Jes fo’ fun and cuz we bored! 

That fictional exchange between black youths–as well as among some not so youthful blacks–has been going on in America for years, as “Leroy” pointed out, but has only recently mushroomed into an epidemic of black violence against whites and anyone else who isn’t black. 

Now “the knockout game” is being played out nationwide in such cities as New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Chicago, St. Louis, Lansing, San Francisco, and even in the nation’s capital, home to the man ultimately responsible for the hate crime mayhem, President Barack Hussein Obama. 

Some of Obama’s mainstream media are grudgingly and hesitantly getting around to reporting incidents of that spreading mayhem yet still refuse to label the attacks for what they are, concerted if yet uncoordinated instances of black hate crimes.   

Fearing the truth, other extreme liberal leftists such as those on Slate.com are reporting the existence of the knockout game but denying it’s a growing trend, that it is at epidemic levels, or that it’s racially motivated: “Most sources claim that it is spreading, and a number of sources claim that it is racially motivated. But how do they know? Where are they getting their data from?” 

It seems lib-leftists require written permission from Obama or maybe being sucker-punched themselves before they admit the obvious, a realization Philly’s black Mayor Michael Nutter sort of grasps. 

Nutter convened a press conference on Monday to try to prevent the “game” from spreading to Philadelphia, blithely ignoring the fact it had already arrived in Northeast Philly and in Lower Merion and not mentioning the salient and damning reality that it is being “played” exclusively by blacks. 

On Thursday, O’Reilly Factor guest, African-American lesbian civil rights activist, Jasmyne Cannick, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34274.)

Race War in America. Part One: the NBPP

Race War in America. Part One: the NBPP

 

The signs, the threats, the warnings and the reality that a murderous race war in America is lurking in our very near future have been on full display for at least five years.  Yet, most Americans are oblivious and in a state of denial that such a war could ever happen here, just as most are unwilling to accept the notion that our nation would or could ever be dominated by a minority intent on accomplishing total dominance over the majority even if that dominance is achieved via all-out, bloody conflict.
Those who dismiss that scenario should consider the New Black Panther Party’s repeated calls for a race war between blacks and whites in our country.  They should consider the recent eruption of blacks attacking whites as part of a “game” of knocking out and sometimes killing innocent white people. They should consider that an admitted black racist works for the Department of Homeland Security despite publicly advocating for a race war against whites.  They should consider that black violence nationwide against virtually everyone not black has reached and surpassed epidemic proportions.

They should consider all those chilling facts of life in Barack Hussein Obama’s America today but they probably won’t because the president’s mainstream media, which dictate what most people know, believe, and understand, persist in covering them up in the interests of political correctness and of maintaining racial peace.

Obviously, that effort isn’t working.

Indeed, the MSM is exacerbating our ongoing racial war by concealing the ugly truths concerning race relations and racial violence in America and thereby providing a certain immunity and encouragement for violent elements in our society to continue their bloody war.

The virulently racist New Black Panther Party, the NBPP, the ostensibly more civil, unofficial successor to the original virulently racist Black Panthers that featured such luminaries as Huey Newton, Elaine Brown, current Illinois Congressman Bobby Rush, and Kanye West’s “reformed” father, Ray West, among other thugs and insurrectionists, never really changed its stripes.

The NBPP, established in 1989, has frequently demonstrated it has changed in name only. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34179.)

JFK vs. BHO--Somewhat Similar, Mostly Different (Part Four)

JFK vs. BHO--Somewhat Similar, Mostly Different (Part Four)

 

Attempting to compare and contrast JFK and BHO without referencing their better halves, First Ladies Jacqueline Lee “Jackie” Bouvier Kennedy and Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, would be a futile exercise since Jackie and Michelle were significant influences and major players in the lives and administrations of their husbands. 

The chief difference was that Jackie made her influence felt behind her private screen and Michelle has overtly exhibited her involvement in every facet of the Obama administration.
Unique in many ways, no two First Ladies could have been more different. 

One was truly a first class lady, the other not so much.  


Few other First Ladies in American presidential history better combined classic beauty, charismatic charm, and educated savoir-faire than Mrs. Kennedy. 

Of Irish-French ancestry, Jackie was born to wealth and privilege like her husband yet never publicly flaunted her privileged status either before or after her marriage to the president of the United States and never intruded into the seamy world of politics.  She had graduated from George Washington University in D.C. with a B.A. in French literature, co-authored the autobiographical, One Special Summer, with her sister, and later worked as an inquiring photographer.

Jackie may have unwittingly become a fashion icon but she always discreetly stayed in the political background and appropriately kept her political opinions to herself. 

Fluent in Spanish and French, she could speak in Italian and Polish and on foreign trips comported herself with the same sense of chic dignity she exhibited at home.  She devoted her free time to organizing White House social events and directing the beautification of the presidential mansion.

More importantly, Mrs. Kennedy studiously avoided controversy at all times and ultimately became one of the most beloved and most popular presidential wives of the twentieth century. 

On the other hand, no other First Lady in American history combined such a seething, racist anger toward America, such an insatiable lust for publicity, and such affection for traveling on taxpayers’ meager dimes than Michelle Obama. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34191.)

JFK vs. BHO--Somewhat Similar, Mostly Different (Part Three)

JFK vs. BHO--Somewhat Similar, Mostly Different (Part Three)

Patrick Buchanan believes, had the assassination of John F. Kennedy not occurred fifty years ago, JFK would be remembered as a mediocre president who accomplished little aside from the passage of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and establishing the Peace Corps.  His other “achievements,” including ending the Cuban Missile Crisis, were all tainted in some way or left unfinished, such as cutting taxes which Lyndon B. Johnson pushed through Congress in Kennedy’s name.

As Buchanan wrote on HumanEvents.com, “Had there been no Dallas, there would been no Camelot.  There would have been no John F. Kennedy as brilliant statesman cut off in his prime, had it not been for those riveting days from Dealey Plaza to Arlington and the lighting of the Eternal Flame.  Along with the unsleeping labors of an idolatrous press and the propagandists who control America’s popular culture, those four days created and sustained the Kennedy Myth.”

Pat Buchanan is probably correct even if the “idolatrous press and the propagandists” still profess JFK’s greatness, much like they still praise our current president despite his few real successes and his many abject failures. 

One such worshipful piece published in April 2012 on WashingtonMonthly.com titled, “Obama’s Top 50 Accomplishments” listed “health care reform,” “passing the stimulus,” ”Wall Street reform,” “ending the war in Iraq,” and “began drawdown of war in Afghanistan” as the top five.

Given the retrospective of 17 months, if those five are Obama’s greatest accomplishments, he actually has none.

If and when the Washington Monthly ever lists his greatest bungles and wrecks, they should be at or near the head of the heap: Obamacare is an unmitigated disaster, the stimulus has stimulated nothing except malaise, Wall Street is as profitably corrupt as ever, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are still raging fiercely though on a smaller scale.

However, unlike Kennedy, Obama was the recipient of the highly prestigious Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his trying to make the world a better place.
According to the Nobel Committee, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34224.) 

So, Obama Asks the Queen . . .

So, Obama Asks the Queen . . .

(Received as an email and slightly edited.  Considering the confused state of affairs in the Barack Hussein Obama administration, ["President Barack Obama told a conference-call audience of progressive volunteers on Monday evening that 'more than 100 million  Americans'--in a nation of less than 314 million--have successfully signed up  for health insurance via the Affordable Care Act"] there just might be more than a grain of truth in this anecdote.)

At a state dinner, President Obama had a question for Queen Elizabeth. “Your Majesty, how do you run such an efficient government? Are there any tips you can give me?”

“Well,” said the Queen, ”the most important thing is to surround yourself with intelligent people.”

Obama frowned, and then asked, “But how do I know if the people around me are really intelligent?”

The Queen took a sip of champagne. “Oh, that’s easy; you just ask them to answer an intelligent riddle. Watch.” She pushed a button on her intercom. “Please send Tony Blair in here, would you?”

Tony Blair walked into the room and said, “Yes, your Majesty?” 

The Queen smiled and said, “Answer me this please Tony. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34172.)

JFK vs. BHO--Somewhat Similar, Mostly Different (Part Two)

JFK vs. BHO--Somewhat Similar, Mostly Different--Part Two

 

Comparing Jack Kennedy to Barack Obama is a task much akin to comparing apples and apple seeds: The apple is a nutritious and tasty fruit whereas apple seeds contain a sugar and cyanide compound which can be toxic in large quantities.

In many ways they’re not comparable though both represent the Democrat Party and eloquent orators, and both became wildly popular among certain segments of the population and abroad even if Kennedy won the 1960 election in a squeaker (two-tenths of one percent–49.7% to 49.5% in the popular vote)–and won with scandalous assistance from Chicago’s corrupt Mayor Richard J. Daley.

Chicago’s own Obama won handily in 2008 and 2012, albeit with the help of a narrow constituency of 13% of the population who twice voted overwhelmingly for him because of his race and with the help of two opponents who can best be described as lackluster Republicans in name only.

It should be noted, however, that Kennedy’s Democrat Party was relatively conservative as contrasted with Obama’s party today, that he delivered his speeches with notes but largely from memory and Obama can’t seem to address anyone without reading from his trusty teleprompters.  Most importantly, Jack had a vision for America that was uplifting and challenging as opposed to Obama’s vision that the nation we know and love was in dire need of liberal-leftist rehabilitation.

Our 35th president firmly believed in the greatness of the country he had fought and risked his life for, an inspirational belief that went far beyond what Americans could do for America for and to literally reach for the moon.  In his campaigns and administrations, our 44th president sought radical changes in America and offered some ambiguous hope as the solution to problems only he and his supporters considered significantly problematic.

Now, granted, both Kennedy and Obama entered office during difficult times. 
 
Kennedy, however, entered with the advantage of a background in national politics–six years in the House of Representatives, six years in the Senate–which afforded him a fundamental understanding of how government functions.  After a brief stint in the Illinois Senate, Obama ran for and won a seat in the United States Senate and two years later won the presidency with a marked lack of experience that was evident from Day One. . . . (Read more http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34092.)