Guns, Egyptians, Nitwits, and Black Swans

Guns, Egyptians, Nitwits, and Black Swans

 

The following four videos involve a young girl instructing grown men and women on the inherent fallacies of gun control, an Egyptian woman demonstrating gross ingratitude toward America’s president, a black congresswoman showing that ignorance isn’t confined only to the illiterate, and swans and goldfish setting an excellent example for race relations in our country.

On Thursday, a superspunky 9 year old New Jersey girl, who will remain  unidentified here to protect her from anti-gun nuts since she happens to be an active, competitive shooter, testified before the New Jersey Law and Public Safety Committee. 

The subject at hand related to a proposed 10-round gun magazine limit and Ms. Spunky had to school the Garden State legislators on the realities, legalities, and practicalities of the useless proposal.

Amazingly, she was received respectfully and applauded enthusiastically by the predominantly-Democrat, predominantly-gun control advocates.  It remains to be seen whether her testimony will sway the Dems to vote rationally or whether they will succumb to pressure from misguided constituents who still ardently believe that guns and not people kill other people.

See lil Ms. Spunky’s riveting testimony and the reaction here http://tinyurl.com/pow28r6.
A much different vid captured an Egyptian woman and supporter of deposed Egyptian dictator Mohamed Morsi demanding that the Muslim world’s once-favorite American president, Barack Hussein Obama, “shut up your mouth.”

The rather incensed, gap-toothed woman clearly articulates her venom by screaming the obviously-rehearsed rant, “I’d like to convey the following message to Obama. Listen, Obama. We are Egyptian women. You are listen, Obama? Shut up your mouth, Obama. Shut up your mouth, Obama!” (http://tinyurl.com/obmluks)

How utterly rude of her!  It seems she is unaware that the guy she is telling to shut up is the same guy who has often expressed his deep love and admiration for all things Islamic and is widely suspected of being a closeted Muslim!

Texas Democrat Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee proved once again that low-information voters will cast their ballots for just about anyone . . . (Read more and see the other videos at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=36311.)

America's Twisted Higher Education

America's Twisted Higher Education

 

Outrages spelled out in “Public Schools: Lechers, Diversity, Nudists” are multiplied exponentially in the outrages regularly  committed by students and school administrators in America’s public and private colleges and universities.

For instance, the publicly-funded University of Tennessee (UT), conducts an annual Sex Week, this year replete with a workshop to teach students how to masturbate, as if they need it.  Tennessee’s Sex Week also includes lectures on orgasms as a political act in addition to masturbation techniques.

One event, “Get Wet: Exploring the Connections Between Sexual Pleasure, Health, & Advocacy,” asks students the eternal questions: “When is an orgasm a political act? When is lube a tool of the revolution?” and promises to “demonstrate how three components of sexuality–pleasure, health, and advocacy–flow into one another as we explore a variety of topics centered on reproductive justice and sexual freedom.”

To further advance the educations of UT’s students, Sex Week also teaches students “which sexual health issues are involved in back-door lovin’, why you should care about sex workers’ rights, and how you can defend your own sexual freedom through self-love.”

Not to be outdone, feminist porn star Tristan Taormino will answer any and all student questions, such as, “Can porn be ethical?” “What is ‘good’ porn?” and “why she thinks anti-porn feminists haven’t watched enough porn.” 

With universities like UT, why would America need whore houses?

Undercover media analyst Mark Dice specializes in outing Americans as being out of touch with political and social realities.  Dice recently showed that sad truth in his interviews of young collegians who have as much grasp on reality as the Obama administration.

He was able to garner hundreds of signatures at a San Diego college campus on a fake petition to imprison all legal gun owners, “peasants,” in concentration camps, have them executed, and repeal the Second Amendment.

Dice patiently explained, “We just want to make sure we disarm the citizens. We can trust the government to be the only ones with guns” and that, “These peasants don’t need guns. We want to put all registered gun owners in prison.”  One student replied, “Yes, it’s too dangerous” for people to own guns.

He told another, “We are going to ban all guns except for the military and police.  We’ll do door to door confiscations, we have lists of all the registered weapons, so the military will just go and take those away from people.” Yet another signed the petition, as most did, despite Dice’s suggestion that we confiscate gun owners’ weapons and shoot them with them since, “If they like their guns so much, let’s just feed the gun owners some of their own lead.”

When Dice threw in the absurdity, “We need to take these gun owners and put them into FEMA concentration camps to keep everybody safe,” most students concurred.
T
hose Dice signatories may simply represent what Rush Limbaugh has described as prime examples of vacuous student “minds filled with mush,” not to mention with their next sexual hook-ups and beer-bong parties, but how do we explain the weird girls at President Obama’s alma mater, Columbia University?

There, a gaggle of five co-eds at Columbia and Barnard College filmed a semi-soft porno film in Columbia’s Butler Library. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=35595.)

Guns, Love 'Em or Hate 'Em

Guns, Love 'Em or Hate 'Em

 

No matter what Americans think of them, guns, although inanimate objects, by their nature and construction are fearsome things capable of sending projectiles of various sorts into military targets, into animals, and into people. 

Likewise, no matter what Americans think of them, efforts at passing gun control regulations aimed at restricting the possession, shipment, or sale of firearms, by their nature and construction are fearsome things capable of inflicting what could be irreparable damage to our freedoms and our Constitution.

No one in his right mind would be opposed to restricting gun possession by mentally ill individuals, precisely the public rationale used by President Barack Hussein Obama in his recent proposals to bypass Congress through executive actions issued by the Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services.  Intentionally key in both proposals is state sharing of all information gathered with the federal database, effectively an administration end-run toward national gun registration.

Foiled repeatedly by the Republican House of Representatives in accomplishing that goal and other sweeping gun controls, our firearm-fixated president is committed to imposing his will on the American people out of allegedly deep concern over protecting innocent victims from such massacres as Sandy Hook, regardless of the reality that his planned measures will have no real effect in preventing future, similar tragedies.

A new study–the latest of many ignored by liberal-leftists intent on controlling everything in our lives, especially guns–once again essentially confirms that strict gun control laws actually lead to higher murder rates and that regulating so-called “assault weapons” has little impact on murder rates.

The study, conducted by Quinnipiac University economist Mark Gius and published in the journal “Applied Economics Letters,” is titled, “An Examination of the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws and Assault Weapons Bans on State-level Murder Rates.” 

Based on data accumulated from 1980 to 2009, the controlled study also clearly indicates that states with laws governing concealed weapons had higher gun-related murder rates than other states.

See the complete study, which will have absolutely no influence on the un-thinking lib-left, here http://tinyurl.com/kgjm2mf . Gun control fanatics refuse to be intimidated by contradictory facts or differing points of view.

For example, amid all the administration-staged, anti-gun propaganda on Sandy Hook–the congressional testimony by grieving parents, the photo-ops featuring fearful children, the emotional declarations condemning firearms–little attention was paid to the words spoken by the father of a Sandy Hook Elementary School child last January 28th. . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=35017.)

Exploiting Sandy Hook Victims

Exploiting Sandy Hook Victims

 

The sickening tragedy visited on twenty innocent kids and six school personnel by a deranged madman a year ago was gut-wrenching for the residents of Newtown, Connecticut and for all Americans.  Capitalizing in any way or for any purpose on that horrific event represents a disgraceful insult to Adam Lanza’s victims and the people of Newtown and the frenzied anti-gun lobby is in the vanguard of those shameless Sandy Hook exploiters.

Despite incontrovertible evidence that guns save more lives than end lives; despite statistical proof that gun violence is more prevalent in states and municipalities with the strictest gun control laws; despite the reality that criminals will always be able to find and use weapons against law-abiding citizens no matter the law; despite the trite yet true axiom that people, not guns, kill people, liberal-leftists continue their cynical campaign to exploit what happened in Newtown.

Led by our propagandist in chief who used his Saturday radio address to push for national gun controls and seconded by his acolytes in the US Senate like Sen. Dick Durban, et al., their exploitation is having little effect as Americans are purchasing guns in record numbers, an estimated 300 million Americans now own one or more, and Obama’s much-beloved Hollywood and the rest of the entertainment industry continue to churn out ultra-violent movies and video ”games.”

One of Barack Hussein Obama’s most ardent supporters committed one of the most blatant exploitations of the Sandy Hook horror.  WaPo, WashingtonPost.com, saw fit to publish a story clearly designed to create fodder for future diatribes against the Second Amendment. 

Titled, “What’s Your Gun Number? Share Your Gun Story,” the article even provided an online form asking questions such as “How many people do you know who have been killed or injured by gun violence?” and . . . " (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34610.)

The NFL Goes PC

The NFL Goes PC

 

The National Football League’s annual Super Bowl game is the most-watched sporting event on the planet just about every year and probably will be again for Super Bowl XLVIII when it’s held on February 2, 2014 at the open-air MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, hopefully during a blizzard.

A cash cow for the NFL, the Super Bowl has generated over a billion dollars for the league since its inception in 1967 thanks to exorbitant ad revenues which this year averaged almost $4 million for a 30-second commercial plus gate receipts of over $70 million, fees for luxury boxes, concessions, and parking.

No doubt the halftime show will be another blockbuster replete with half-naked stars of stage, screen, and television and maybe another intentional wardrobe malfunction, and commercials advertising everything from beer to booze to erectile dysfunction remedies–but not guns.

You see, anything related to guns is not politically correct nowadays because guns not people kill people and guns singlehandedly kill many thousands of people in America every year–and the NFL has had more than enough problems with players shooting and killing people, thank you very much!

The oozing hypocrisy of the tax exempt NFL in twice declining to sell airtime for a 30 second spot on the next Super Bowl extravaganza to the Georgia brick and mortar store, (as opposed to online outlets), Daniel Defense, because the ad allegedly violates the League’s non-violent philosophy is beyond sickening. 

Specifically, the NFL advised Fox Television that the commercial violates its inviolable ad restrictions: “Firearms, ammunition or other weapons are prohibited; however, stores that sell firearms and ammunitions (e.g., outdoor stores and camping stores) will be permitted, provided they sell other products and the ads do not mention firearms, ammunition or other weapons.”

However, Daniel Defense does sell “other products,” including men’s and women’s apparel, a fact that went for nought.

Also, the Daniel Defense proposed half-minute spot . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=34419.)